Hideo Kojima, from Rolling Stone discusses the evolution, not revolution, of Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Beware of spoilers if you read the article.
In 1977, George Lucas revolutionized not only film but the entire entertainment industry with Star Wars.
But, 40 years later, Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) isn’t a revolution. A revolution is when the oppressed overthrow the oppressor, the old are replaced by the new, giving rise to new countries and concepts. The Last Jedi doesn’t change the boundaries established by Star Wars in its story, expression (technique and design) nor how its business operates.
However, rather than this being something negative about the film, it is proof that The Last Jedi is indeed the right kind of Star Wars for the 21st century.
Lucas’ original Star Wars is a story of revolution, where the rebellion led by Princess Leia along with Han Solo and Jedi Knight Obi-Wan Kenobi and Luke Skywalker stand against the Galactic Empire. The Last Jedi depicts the battles between the heavily armed First Order and the Resistance fighters. This structure is inherited from The Force Awakens, an “Empire versus Rebellion” theme that is persistent throughout the Star Wars series.
Near the end of The Last Jedi, Kylo Ren kills Snoke, the Supreme Leader of the First Order. This is a coup d’état by Kylo, and should be considered an internal structural revolution. However, while Kylo invites Rey to create a new order along with him, he never actually attempts to do so. Instead of destroying the First Order, he merely occupies the now vacant position of Supreme Leader. It seems that only the leadership in the organization changes, while its objective and power structure are left intact. What happens next might be portrayed in future episodes, but at this point, the First Order has only undergone a succession in administration, rather than an actual revolution.
Take the link below to read this fascinating article.